In the run-up to the UN’s net phase of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), the US and the EU still can’t agree on who should be administering the internet. WSIS was set up with fine principles to make international policy on the internet. ICANN is the body set up by the US government to assign numbers and domain names. Which of these should decide policy?
This article, in some detail, explains the background to the controversy. It raises questions about whether ICANN can operate in the interests of the planet and he outlines some of the policy areas that are making this more than a technical issue of server addresses and IP numbers:
- Spreading access to the disadvantaged, and providing content of value to them in their native languages.
- Inequitable costs paid by underdeveloped countries to connect to the major countries that offer Internet service.
- The need to guarantee business transactions online.
- Revising laws regarding speech for the Internet (eg. accuracy).
- Prosecution of those committing electronic crime
Love it? Hate it? We want to know: Leave us a comment (0 so far)