Search

    Categories

    • Consumer technology
    • Education sector
    • Information industry
    • IT
    • Mobile technology
    • Research
    • Social media

    Subscribe by Email

    Enter your email address:

    KindleTweet

    Comments

    • Evolyte on Wolfram (just as well it’s an) Alpha
    • Inspectorinsight » The Future of Insight on Nice article on the why future thinking qualitative research can be more helpful than backward looking quant via @willmcinnes
    • kindleresearch on Nice article on the why future thinking qualitative research can be more helpful than backward looking quant via @willmcinnes
    • Neil Gains on Nice article on the why future thinking qualitative research can be more helpful than backward looking quant via @willmcinnes
    • Ben Fairweather on Don’t shoot the messenger!

We Think...

   

Is Web 2.0 useful or futile?

June 30, 2008. Posted by Paul in Consumer technology, Information industry. Comments (0) so far.

Is social media really making a difference? This article questions whether all that energy going into Web 2.0 applications is going to provide solutions to the major problems we face as a planet. Or is it just a load of fluff, bad videos and entertainment?

Clearly it is changing lives – assuming they have the technology, individuals can take on corporations and governments. We are connected. How we talk to each other and how businesses talk to us is changing. But a lot of the content is so…frivolous. Just look at what is top of Digg and Youtube over the last 7 days.

As someone who spends a lot of time trying to make sense of it all, I’m always reassured when I listen to other experts who are also struggling to make sense of it. It’s confusing

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Love it? Hate it? We want to know: Leave us a comment (0 so far)

Lots of papers being published aren’t being read

June 4, 2008. Posted by Paul in Information industry. Comments (0) so far.

Always a great read, Jonathan Wolff, wittily argues that UK academics are spending too long publishing research papers that are not being read by anyone. It is the case that academics are under a lot of pressure to publish as part of the way that they are evaluated and monitored and many are not reading all they feel they should be.

One answer would seem to be better tools for retrieving the information they need rather than having to trawl through a lot of papers. Academics are also partly responsible for the volume of content through the peer review system – why do they put themselves through it?

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Love it? Hate it? We want to know: Leave us a comment (0 so far)


 
 
 
  • ABOUT KINDLE
  • |
  • HOME
  • |
  • PEOPLE
  • |
  • SERVICES
  • |
  • WORK
  • |
  • CONTACT
  • |
  • BLOG
  • |
  • VACANCIES
AQR ICG Group MRS

© 2008 Kindle Research - Design by Origin8 and powered by Frisbee